Tuesday, December 13, 2005

End of the Spear

Some movies, in spite of their big budgets, deep pockets and all-star casts, can leave us as cold as Saturday-morning pancakes on Sunday night. The Phantom Menace or Troy come to mind.

Other movies rise above their tiny budgets, technical flaws and no-name casts. End of the Spear is one of these. It’s well-made, mostly well-acted and stacks up well, artistically, against the kind of films courted at Sundance and Telluride.

The movie won’t please all audiences, however. In spite of its visual artistry, outstanding lead performances and overall technical competency, it tells a true story that’s just hard to fathom.

In short, End of the Spear is the story of five missionaries who rather rashly make contact with a notoriously violent tribe in a remote Ecuador jungle. The five men are murdered. The next step is not reprisal, however. Instead, two women from the tribe come out of the jungle. And after befriending them, female family members—and children—of the slain men trek back into the jungle to live with the Waodani, love them and “convert” them. But the point of the story is not the evangelistic and proseletyzing project; in fact, there’s less preaching in this movie than in At Play in the Fields of the Lord or The Mission. The point of the story is that, given ample opportunity to take revenge, the son of one of the murdered men overcomes the very natural and human “eye for an eye” instinct. He and his father’s murderer, in fact, become fast friends, as the entire Waodani tribe abandons a settled social pattern of escalating reprisals in favor of a culture of forgiveness and peace.

This is not a perfect movie. In the interest of truthfulness, the screenplay presents us with so many characters that only a couple of them really become completely three-dimensional. We never really understand what makes these missionaries tick, for instance. And the cut-away editing of the story’s countless murders, while undoubtedly necessary to avoid an R rating, is mis-timed just enough that it calls attention to itself in a sometimes jarring way.

But these are quibbles. The biggest problem facing an audience when watching End of the Spear is likely to be unbelief—not lack of belief in the Christian religion, simply because half of the characters in the story are missionaries, but lack of belief in the story itself.

Like other powerful stories of reconciliation, social justice and repentance (such as Final Solution, Gandhi or even The Mission) End of the Spear is its own worst enemy because it dares to tell us that there really are people who are brave enough to put themselves wholly and submissively in the power of their enemies—not because their enemies are so powerful that there’s no choice, but because it’s the right thing to do. And like Final Solution, End of the Spear goes one step further by telling us that this kind of radical peacemaking does, in fact, have the power to transform enemies into friends, without the need for the “satisfaction” of justice.

So moviegoers of any stripe may well come away from End of the Spear simply shaking their heads and saying, “Well, clearly they took some liberties with this story, because such things just don’t happen. It isn’t realistic.” And this is just as likely with Christian audiences as any.

I can’t tell you the number of times that I, in my role as a pastor and teacher, have had devout, educated, faithful Christians insist that Jesus submitted to his enemies only because it was necessary, in the divine scheme of things, that he die. Without God’s demand for an atoning blood sacrifice, they argue, Jesus would have been in smackdown mode. Self defense, even lethal force, would have been the order of the day. They insist that, contrary to Jesus’ own teaching in The Sermon on the Mount, His behavior from Gethsamane to Golgotha was in no way intended to serve as an example for our own behavior in the “real world.”

But in the case of stories such as End of the Spear and Final Solution, and even Gandhi, radical and lasting moral change in the real world really is brought about by a radical commitment to non-violence. And the fact remains that these stories are true. These movies force us to deal with that truth.

We can either admit that our own rationalized, compromised and temporized ways of thinking are somehow defective, or we can dismiss these stories as mere fictionalizations or myths. The choice is up to us.

But these are stories that aren’t going away anytime soon. And some myths just happen to be true, powerfully so.

39 Comments:

Blogger Hokule'a Kealoha said...

Elisabeth Elliot, the widow of Jim Elliot, one of the leaders of this effort has been one of my heros for much of my life. The Incredible truth of this story transends time. Jim Elliot knew as a college student that he would bea a martyr for the faith. But he wasnt a man with a death wish but a man with a mission to serve God no matter the cost. Yes the wives went back and lived with the Waroni/Auca people... but their mission was not fruitful in conversions, unless you count the "conversion" of the ladies that made this effort. Their lives and the lives of the families were changed forever. And their blood spilt inspired a whole generation of young missionaries, my mother among them... I am glad, very glad that this tale is being told again to a new audience. It deserves its place as one of the great adventure stories of the last century

1:13 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Thanks for the comments. I do highly recommend this film also, and agree that whatever flaws it might have are truly insignificant in the big picture.

And yes -- the power of the story is as much in what happened in the lives of the missionaries as in the lives of the Waodani.

1:33 PM  
Blogger Laura said...

You said, "radical and lasting moral change in the real world really is brought about by a radical commitment to non-violence."

I think you completely missed the point of not only the movie but of the lives of the people portrayed in it. Radical and lasting moral change is brought about by Jesus Christ. If a group of Marxists (or pick any other group unlikely to be associated with Jesus Christ) were "brave enough to put themselves wholly and submissively in the power of [the Waodani]" do you honestly believe that this radical and lasting moral change would have occurred? The Waodoni themselves attribute the change to Jesus Christ, not to pacifism.

The movie is not "preachy" because it doesn't need to be. The facts speak for themselves.

8:26 AM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Laura,

First, I hope that movies (and movie reviews, too!) can be starting places for conversations, not the final word.

I certainly agree, personally, that "radical and lasting moral change is brought about by Jesus Christ." But that's a truth that the movie itself does not explicitly present. The movie shows that such transformation can, indeed, happen—but it doesn't explain how, exactly, it does happen. Nobody talks a bit about Jesus Christ or the Holy Spirit.

Of course, the characters don't have to. The movie tells a story, tells it well, and doesn't need to be preachy, as you note. In fact, I commend the movie for its lack of preachiness, if that wasn't clear in my review.

You ask, somewhat rhetorically, if I think similar actions by non-Christians could have similar transformational power. I say, "Yes." The principles that Jesus taught and lived by are not a magical talisman that can only be wielded by professing believers. What Gandhi achieved through passive resistance in India is a perfect example of a similar commitment to noviolence—one motivated by a completely different source.

Christians do not have the ethics and morality market cornered.

Now, a different question is: "How likely is it that a non-Christian would do what those missionaries did?" And I would say, not very.

But again, Scripture itself shows that God does not limit the dispensation of His Holy Spirit soley to His "Chosen People."

God will do what God will do—and I praise Him for that, because without his mercy and his grace, we'd all be much worse off!

Did you read my interview with the film's director? It's also posted on my blog. His own comments about how the movie gets its message across are excellent.

Thanks for reading!

10:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I ANTICIPATE THIS MOVIE. IT SHOWS ME THAT GOD NEVER FORGETS HIS SERVANTS. SINCE THE BIRTH OF EACH MISSIONARY HE HAS BEEN PLANNING THIS STORY. SATAN MAY HAVE THOUGHT HE HAD WON BUT GUESS WHAT HE DID NOT. MAY THESE FIVE MEN AND OTHERS BE WATCHING FROM THE REALMS OF HEAVEN AND BE REJOICING FOR THEIR STORIES BEEN TOLD. LET US GIVE GOD THE GLORY AND PRAISE.

3:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have not seen this film, so i will not judge it cinamatic value. However i would like to state some simple facts about the Huaorani people's supposed benefit from contact with the Missionaries. The tribes were engaged in tribal warfare around the time of War World 2. The statements that these were a violent and savage people is laughable when compare to the attrocities and horrors committed by the "civilized" world during the second world war. Apart from that racist one sided view of these people, the great benefit of christianization for these people was exploitation, slavery and loss of their homes. These acts were commited by oil companies with direct ties to rachel saint. They are impoverished, they live in practical toxic waste dumps, and they have no rights.
If you think these people gained so much, let some one build an oil refinery in your back yard, dump waste where your children play, and throw you at out of the placew where your family has lived for generations then come talk to me.

1:21 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Leonard,

Thanks for bringing the discussion back to the real world.

My review naturally oversimplifies some of the issues involved, as would ANY review or movie treatment of the story. For that I apologize, sort of.

But your take on the facts are an oversimplification, too.

To say that calling the Waodani "violent and savage" is "laughable" when compared to Western violence and savagery seems to downplay violence and savagery in general. Which is worse -- the wholesale slaughter of millions (on both sides) in World War II, or a pattern of retribution that kills 60% of your people?

The answer is, "Neither." Both are horrific. And neither one excuses or minimizes the other, much as we might like to.

And to suggest that Western civilization is somehow more culpable because it is "civlized" is to basically call the Waodani (and other indigenous peoples) savages who just don't know any better. That's pretty demeaning, too, Leonard.

So I'm not sure how your view is any less "racist" and "one sided" than mine.

Also it's a bit disingenuous to lay the blame for "exploitation, slavery and loss of homes" solely at the feet of "christianization." The economics of oil development in that region were pretty inexorable; so the real question would be: are the Waodani worse off or better off for their contact with these missionaries, under that scenario?

If you believe "worse," that's okay by me. But your belief doesn't make it so. End of the Spear tells the story of a handful of very real people, and for them, the answer is "better."

Now, it would certainly be interesting and instructive to see this story told from the standpoint of some Waodani who answer "worse." And I'd give that story -- if it was well-told -- as much coverage as I give this one.

Bottom line is: this movie tells a profound story of reconciliation. Do you buy it, or not? Go see the movie and let me know.

Indcidentally, who exactly do you think hasn't had someone "build an oil refinery in their back yard, dump waste where their children play, and throw them out of the place where their family has lived for generations"? Isn't that the story of America?

And it's happening just a few blocks from where I live -- it's just airstrips instead of oilfields.

So I think we can pretty much all relate to that injustice. The Waodani suffer no more than the poor children of Calcutta or our own inner cities.

That doesn't make any of it right; but I recommend we have compassion on them all.

Greg

2:16 PM  
Blogger C.P.O. said...

man, great review and responses Greg. Good stuff to think about.

7:59 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Thank you, Todd!

6:49 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I really know better but its hard to let leonards comments go unchallenged.

Leonards use of the word "Huaorani" shows he has a back ground and intimate knowledge of the tribal situation in the Amazonia, his reference to the oil companies and Racheal Saint gives him a historical perspective also.

With all his great understanding he still seems to have missed a few facts that I am sure he is aware of.

In 1956 the estimated population of the Wao was 200 plus aprox. Today there are 1400 or so. Would these numbers be the same if not for the missionaries?

The killings in the tribe were not just among different family groups but also between family members. How do you relate that to todays culture in America?

Effective modern missions bring medical help and education were it had not been avalible. How many babys were saved with simple antibiotics brought by missionaries? What if it was your child? would you not be thankful for the help of a foriener if he could save the life of your little girl?

A good friend is a Native American professor of indigenous studies. His view point is. "The only way to save native culture is through education. Civilization will over-run the native people unless they are prepared to meet it head on."

Its simple to find examples in history of missions doing damage to native culture. But if we stop and look at the positive side I feel that we would be glad for the huge risks and even the loss of life, all given selflessly for the good of others. Just how many secular scientists can you say that have done that?

My background? I don't know much but I have walked the trail in Wao territory, I know Mincaye, Saint, Tementa ect. Been to the Currary, Maranon, Negro, Napo, Pastaza, Amazon and other rivers. Worked to bring a little help to those others have forgotten.

Leonard says racist one side views? Most of the native people I have come into contact with are very inteligent. The "survival of the fittest" thing tends to weed out the stupid. In America our laws protect the less than inteligent from hurting themselfs

{Read "Guns, Germs and Steel"}

OK I did it, I will hate myself later for posting this. But thanks!

Oh, I am a born again Christ follower that can't stand the current attack on all things Christian.

Tom

10:48 AM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Tom,

Thanks for giving us some first-hand accounts of that area. Very helpful.

And now, we can all take a deep breath and calm down...

Heh heh.

Greg

10:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A couple of questions...

Would it bother anyone to know that the lead missionary is played by a gay activist?

Does it mean that our armed forces members are never going to be Chrsitians because they fight?

3:04 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Linda,

Not only would it not particularly bother me "to know that the lead missionary is played by a gay activist," the subject doesn't even really interest me.

If only perfect people could play Christ, for instance, Christ would never have been portrayed on screen. Hopefully, you're not suggesting that The Passion of the Christ shouldn't have been made because Jim Caviezel is a sinner (and because Mel Gibson has a foul mouth); and hopefully you're not suggesting that End of the Spear is gay agenda tract. If you choose to make the sexuality of the actors an issue, you are the one introducing the subject, not the filmmakers. This film has nothing whatever to do with sexuality of any sort.

While a deacon at my church, I was addicted to pornography. Should I have resigned? If I had, would God have been able to work the regeneration in my that he has?

From what do your own sins disqualify you? And please, don't tell me you don't have any, before you pick up another stone.

You also ask if the fact that passive resistance is effective means "that our armed forces members are never going to be Chrsitians because they fight." It's fair to say that the dilemma of Christian soldiers has been around as long as Christ—and as far as I know, the dilemma has never been definitively resolved; I doubt it will be any time soon.

But one person's conscience and God's sovreignty are very mysterious things, difficult to judge. I don't presume to.

But if one argues in favor of the use of force, one will have to make the argument from outside the text of the New Testament.

Are the personal experiences and examples of Jesus and his apostles wholly irrelevant?

In Christ,

Greg

5:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greg,
Greatly appreciate your review and thoughful comments, including replies to posters.

In response to your statement, "But if one argues in favor of the use of force, one will have to make the argument from outside the text of the New Testament," I will point out the following:

1. In Matthew chapter 8, Jesus marveled at the faith of the centurion, "Truly I say to you, I have not found such great faith with anyone in Israel." He doesn't tell him "Go, and sin no more."

2. In John chapter 2 Jesus uses non-lethal force to drive merchants out of the temple.

3. In John 18:6 when Jesus said to those who came to arrest him, "I am He," they drew back and fell to the ground. (I wish Mel portrayed this in "The Passion" as it shows starkly the voluntary nature of Jesus' submission)

4. In Acts chapter 5 Ananias and Sapphira certainly experienced the use of deadly force.

5. The Lion of Revelation is the personification of force.

I have greeted scores of amputees returning from the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan, been to a few military graveside services, stood alongside grieving widows, parents, children, and prayed with family and friends at the burn center in the days following 9-11... Few exemplify love as clearly as these military folk (and kindred spirits in law enforcement and emergency response) who daily lay down their lives for their friends (and strangers).

It seems clear that the use of force of itself is not an issue to Jesus and friends, but what we must wrestle with are the wheres, whens and hows it will be used.

BTW - after reading Nate Saint's story "Jungle Pilot" I offered God my service as a mission aviator - He hasn't accepted that offer, yet. I'll see the movie soon!

8:53 AM  
Blogger Imagnify said...

I have found out some disturbing information about this movie.

There appears to be some rather lively discussions out there, especially on some blogs that question the wisdom of giving someone like Chad Allen (who plays both the parts of Nate and Steve Saint) a platform for his homosexual activism. He's not just an actor who's gay; he's a very "in your face" activist. As you know, many young people become enamored with actors when they see them in movies and pull up their websites. Apparently, his site encourages teens to "come out." He's also produced a play called Corpus Christi (?) that, I believe, portrays Jesus and his disciples as homosexuals.

I'm saddened that what otherwise may be a very fine movie is swirling with this controversy.

9:38 AM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

The text that follows is the filmmakers' official response to the issue of Chad Allen's sexual orientation. I don't think anything additional needs to be said... But I'll throw in a quote from Steve Saint himself: "I could feel physical pain thinking [that] somebody that lives a lifestyle like that is going to depict my dad... [But] I thought: What happens if I stand before God someday and He says to me, 'Steve, I went out of my way to orchestrate an opportunity for Chad Allen to see what it would be like to live as your father did.' And then I could picture Him looking at me and saying, 'Steve, why did you mess with my plan?'"

Dear inquirer,

We are the filmmakers of End of the Spear. We cast Chad Allen because he had the best audition of anyone else by far. We know that the character in the film and the actor are not the same. If as a film company we could only work with people who were completely sanctified then the film would never have been made. We do not agree with Chad over homosexuality. End of the Spear is not about Chad Allen, but rather it's about remarkable people who lived their faith against all odds, and dared to reach out at the cost of their lives.

The discussion over sin and working with sinners has been in the body of Christ from the beginning. We are glad that our lives are not being compared with Nate Saint. We don't believe we would stack up.

The story is greater than the storytellers and it would be an enormous disservice if great stories of faith like this one were reduced to the human shortcomings of the filmmakers. We invite you to experience End of the Spear and then judge for yourself the message you are left with.

In Christ,

Jim Hanon
Director/Writer End of the Spear

Bill Ewing
Producer/Writer End of the Spear

Mart Green
Producer End of the Spear
Founder/CEO Every Tribe Entertainment

5:30 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Alan,

Thanks for your compliments! Glad you dropped in.

As I mentioned above, "the dilemma of Christian soldiers has been around as long as Christ—and as far as I know, the dilemma has never been definitively resolved." And the texts you cite are part of that ongoing debate.

I'm afraid I didn't make it clear that I wasn't attempting to address that issue at all. The only aspect of the use of force that's relevant to the discussion of End of the Spear is this: Should a minister of Christ use lethal force in self defense when attacked?

And none of texts you cite apply to that limited case. All of the examples we have from the New Testament point to a negative answer to the above question.

You are absolutely right "that the use of force of itself is not an issue to Jesus and friends, but what we must wrestle with are the wheres, whens and hows it will be used." And that's a very complicated discussion.

But hopefully, we'd expect very different things from Billy Graham, for instance, than we would from a new convert.

I hope you hear from Steve Saint soon! I'd LOVE to be able to do that kind of ministry!

Greg

5:40 PM  
Blogger Matt said...

Thanks for the Review. You make me stop and think when you talk about a commitment to nonviolence. Just passing through. Thanks again.

12:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not an intellectual, just a simple believer. While the Passion spent all it's big budget on how they killed Christ this movie simply stated that He freely gave it. It did not have to preach or even mention His name. The love of Christ was shown in the LIVES that these men and women lived and the sacrifice that they were willing to make to share the gospel. We don't have to beat people over the head with Bibles...but we are expected to live like He lived...and perhaps even unto death as He did to share His love. I didn't need the development of charachters,,,it would have taken away from the message. I came away asking myself "Do I love anyone enough to really, really, really risk living like Christ?" Well, it is 2:30 in the morning and I talking to myself about this...I can tell you the Passion did not affect me this way.

10:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Although this movie never really mentioned the name of Jesus, I believe it did a superb job of showing what it means to unreservedly live and die for him. I am so glad I got to see the movie and will encourage my entire congregation to see it as well. In this day of Christian bashing, it was refreshing to see Christians presented in such an unselfish light. I hope in the future to see many mory movies about such heroes of the faith.

6:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My Dad was about 8 or 9 when the 5 missionaries were killed. This story had a huge impact on his life about missions. Today, he is the Regional Coordinator for Foursquare Mission is East and Central Africa. He brought home a DVD to my son this past Christmas of a cartoon version of the life of Jim Elliot. He never realized that there are people out there who have never heard the Gospel of Christ. But because of their story he "gets" what Grandma and Grandpa do. And feels the calling on his life, that i have known about for years, to be in Missions. I am thankful for this movie and the life changing story, now told to my children. And thankful for the sacrifices of the families involved.

8:52 PM  
Blogger Lyn said...

Greg,
Thanks for your balanced review. I linked to you at http://blogginoutloud.blogspot.com/2006/01/daily-brew-060123.html
My only question, how did you get to see the movie in December! lol, lgp

6:01 AM  
Blogger Kat said...

Greg,
Excellent review on "End of the Spear". I was a bit disappointed by some of the other reviews out, especially the hyper-reactive, anti-Christian one by Allison Benedikt in the Chicago Tribune. Following is my own blog on that one:
Allison Benedikt offers us another liberal serving of bias in her review of “The End of the Spear”. I certainly hope she never gets called for jury duty—An open mind she doesn’t have! I wish she’d judged the film on its own merit, not through an anti-christian grid.
If anything, its weakness lies in the uncertainty of whose story is being portrayed. Is it the story of Nate Saint who, along with his companions, gave his life to bring the news of hope to tribal people? Is it the story of Steve Saint, whose life was forever changed by his father’s death at their hands? Is it the story of the Waodani, people destined for extinction at their own hands unless someone intervened to save them? Or is it the story of Someone bigger than all of them put together? The producers seem to vacillate between the first three possibilities here, with more emphasis on Steve and on the Waodani people, but Someone (read that “God”) seems to have a supporting role. The film offers no real insight into God’s relationship with the tribal people as individuals, beyond a change in lifestyle. Surely the missionaries themselves would be a bit uncomfortable about that!
Another weakness is the fact that a huge amount of footage at the beginning of the film was used to establish the hopeless condition of the Waodani, but relatively little was expended at the end to show the result of reconciliation and forgiveness. Only the trailer for “Beyond the Gates of Splendor” really emphasized the solidity of the relationship that now exists between Mincayan and Steve (and the rest of the Saints). That is the earthly, day by day reconciliation that has taken place between murderer and victim—the whole point, I thought that the movie was intended to make. Practical forgiveness is one of the things God commands of His people, no matter what culture they represent.
On the plus side, “End of the Spear” has some beautiful cinematography. I especially liked the grainy, black and white shots when the missionaries are photographing the scene at Palm Beach. Cornell Capa would have enjoyed those, I think. A number of the film shots mimicked the actual photographs of the encounter and of the wives as they waited for news of their husbands.
Although Miss Benedikt seems to have a problem with the subtitles’ stilted dialog, she fails to take into consideration the Waodani’s actual speech patterns. Perhaps she would have been happier with a more “Westernized” version—one that did not respect their own language and its peculiarities.
“End of the Spear” is well-told and largely true to the facts. It does a good job of establishing the relationship between Stevie and his father, although it is a bit weaker when it comes to exploring the new relationship between Steve and Mincayan. Of the entire cast, Mincayan shows the most development of character throughout the movie, and it would have been good to see that same depth of development in the adult Steve. I have heard Steve Saint speak, and he has been profoundly changed by his relationship with Mincayan and the other Waodani. He has given his life for them...just as his father did.
This film certainly is not a no-holds-barred Christian movie, and contrary to what Allison Benedikt implies, the words, “accept Jesus as our Lord and Savior” do not appear anywhere in the film. I expect many Christians wish they did, so that Jesus would get the credit for the change in these people’s lives. Otherwise, “End of the Spear” remains a sweet and sentimental story instead of the revolutionizing life or death experience it is for the Waodani...and for the Saints.
All in all, in spite of some weaknesses, it remains a good film, an eye-opener into the possibility of hope for hopeless people. Go see it.

10:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My pastor summed this controversy up very well yesterday. He stated that he refuses "to follow the sheep over the edge of the cliff." Rather, my pastor vows to listen to the voice of the Shepherd.

My pastor, who attended ORU with some in the production team, was very upset at the behavior of pastors and churches who are boycotting this movie. He used the story of Jesus dining with Matthew, the tax collector and the criticism of the Pharisees over Jesus' association with sinners. Jesus responded to the criticism that He came to call the lost, not those religious people who felt they had everything already figured out.

Today's church is exclusive. We expect sinners to come to us for salvation. We require them to conform to our likeness rather than Christ's. That's not how Jesus saw sinners.

Jesus went to the sinners. He treated them with love and hope, inclusion and forgiveness. Sinners were drawn to Him and they invited their friends to come see Him. What kind of friends did Matthew have? Other tax collectors, corrupt government officials, prostitutes, and probably some homosexuals as well. Who wasn't invited to the party? Pharisees - religious people.

May God forgive the Church for being so clueless today.

1:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gosh - so they've made a movie out of this story! (I go away from this site for a few days and there it is - though I've seen the issue (book?) discussed on another area of this vast site, I didn't know that a movie had been released.)

I must say I have been rather fascinated by this true-life story, ever since I found it on an independent site on the internet last year... I thought it sounded very intriguing (and I'm not a Christian.)

On the site I read, which was about jungle filming and that sort of thing, it seemed to take the view that the missionaries were trying to help the Waorani against the oil companies, who had robbed them of some of their land before. (It was a rather "right-on" (that means leftish/environmental!) site, so from my point of view I saw no reason to disbelieve them.)

Greg Wright, you're obviously a pacifist - all props to you. But, I think you see, that so many of your Christian "brethren" (in the USA) are not: because they have been taught to identify Christ with the right-wing agenda, with "just wars", militarism, expansionism, patriarchy, right-wing economics (!) and all the rest of it.... Just stating what should be some pretty apparent facts, but which are never of course called to notice in your media.

So that's why a movie like this would make many uneasy, I think...

I call to mind some words in a rather old novel, called "The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists"... sounds Irish in tone, doesn't it? It was written by an Irishman in England, Robert "Tressell" as he styled himself. Therein, Tressell has one of his characters ask (and I paraphrase slightly, not having the book to hand): "But what would happen if Christians were to *really* practice as Christ preaches? Christ said: if a man steal your coat, give him your cloak as well: we would say give him prison at hard labour! Christ said to love your neighbour as yourself: if they belong to another country, we think it is all right to invade their lands, rend them to pieces, burn their fields and terrorize their women and children..." And so and on so forth, does he continue in this vein.

Yes: I think that the Christian point of view has a long way to go, when it is combined with the "current system". The "current system" does nothing but distort it and make it into a mockery.

I'm glad that there are some Christians not prepared to take the easy route, even if they have to go into the middle of the jungle to prove that. (What might they achieve if they started working, and without selling out, in the jungle of our modern capitalism?)

6:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I saw the film last night. I am a family member of a murder victim. It was a very violent death of a sweet saint of God. Because of a miraculous work of the Holy Spirit in my heart several years before she was killed, I know firsthand the unfathomable grace God can give when we are willing to forgive the unforgivable. The film has an unmistakeable message of reconciliation. This is not the story of the missionary or of their families. In the end it is about the redeeming value of forgiveness for the forgiven. Yes, I believe forgiveness is so very important for the forgiver, but in our ME culture the emphacis always comes back to forgiveness being of such great benefit to the forgiver. Even current psycho-babble preaches the value of forgiveness for the offended. But to forgive in the power of the Holy Spirit releases the grip of shame on the offendor. The Holy Spirit can touch a heart that is not defending itself against itself.

I am going to see the film again today. I need to be enveloped in the peace it brings. Funny thing to say about a story with so much violence.

Also want to say I agree with much of what Liz had to say. Because of that I do not find myself at home in the present climate of the body of Christ.

8:07 AM  
Blogger Chris Utley said...

I didn't know about this story at all until Greg Wright showed us the trailer and gave us the backstory at HJAG 2005 this past December. So, as I saw the film on Saturday night, I literally entered a world I never knew existed - I'm not just speaking about the Waodani tribe, I'm talking about Missions as a whole. I never even knew what Missions was until I became a Christian 11 years ago.

The film was very intense and pretty good. It was good to see a message of forgiveness and redemption grounded in reality and void of heavy-handed "Christianese". The filmmakers made nice usage of widescreen lenses to capture the scenery. The film LOOKED as good as it actually was. I'm glad to have seen it.

3:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As both a Christian and someone who grew up hearing the story of Jim Elliot. et al, I truely loved this movie. This movie is a prime example of God's Word not returning to Him void. i have had the priveledge to personnaly know many missionaries through the years and am proud to call some friend! There is no su stitute for what God does for us!

2:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greg,
Saw the movie---loved it. Was very sorry to hear that Chad Allen is a homosexual activist.
We are all sinners---hopefully, saved by Grace. God loves the sinner but hates the sin. He calls sin what it is, it was His decision, not ours. I wonder how He feels when a sinner, whom He loves so much He died for, lifts that sin up and declares it to be no sin at all...then sets out to convince everyone else that it is right?
Instead of feeling shame for our sinfulness, we boast about it and do what we can to shape the next generation to accept, approve and applaude it.
Can't you see actors proclaiming themselves to be adulterors, liars, cheats, thieves, murderers, pedifiles/molesters, gossips and the like. Not really. Usually, they keep their sins to themselves. The media are quick to share their infidelities, but we don't normally see actors out campaigning for sins.
My son played high school basketball with Jim Caviezal's brother in Mount Vernon, WA. I am quite certain, Jim is not perfect. But, if I found out that he was a member of the church of Satan, I probably would not appreciate his playing the role of Jesus. Do you see what I am saying. To dismiss Chad Allen as a sinner, like everyone else is, is not totally accurate. He is recruting for the cause of something the Bible (that Nate Saint gave his life for) calls sin.
Thank you. Very sincerely, Shari

11:06 AM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Shari,

Thanks very much for a measured, reasoned reponse.

"We are all sinners---hopefully, saved by Grace," as you say; yes. But as the preaching pastor at my church said last night, we have to be convinced of the sin, first, before grace can do its thing. We can't repent from something we aren't convinced is wrong.

So in such cases, we don't really "boast about it and do what we can to shape the next generation to accept, approve and applaud it." We can't boast about sinning in cases like that, because we don't see it as sin. Others from the outside might have a crystal clear view; but we are blind to our own folly.

The reason we don't "see actors proclaiming themselves to be adulterors, liars, cheats, thieves, murderers, pedifiles/molesters, gossips and the like" is that there's still pretty much a secular concensus that those things are wrong. Not so with homosexuality--as unfortunate as that may be.

So I see what you're saying about Jim Caviezel, and even about Chad Allen.

But what I'm saying is this: What are the sins to which YOU are still blind, the sins to which I am still blind? For we are all still sinful.

And how does God treat me while I am yet a sinner, unwitting as that sin might be?

To the extent that God is merciful and loving toward us, we should be merciful and loving toward others.

Chad Allen "is recruting for the cause of something the Bible calls sin," yes. But he doesn't claim to believe what the Bible says. And I doubt that could convince him of what the Bible says simply by quoting chapter and verse.

So: What do you plan to do help God's Spirit open Chad's eyes? What do you plan to do to help God open your own?

We all still see as through a glass darkly. And some are accountable for much more than others.

In Christ,
Greg

4:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greg,
Thanks! Yes, we are all in need of our eyes being open to our own sin. For that, I pray daily. A good friend taught me years ago to walk DAILY in repentance and forgiveness. When the Spirit of the Lord comes often throughout the day and nudges, or pierces my heart with the reality of my many sins, His grace enables me to confess and repent of them. (Some easier than others!!)
I pray regularly for the homosexual community. I have several friends who are part of that "family". I look at homosexuality alittle differently than many Christians. I don't just simply see it as our sins. I see it as God's judgment on a society that has refused His TRUTH. That causes me to be very careful about how I pray regarding it!
We have "exchanged the TRUTH of God (as Creator) for a lie" (we just happened, we got here all by ourselves! Evolution) Romans 1 continues to then say that because of this...God turns us over to do.....absolutely everything we see our sinful society doing today; first on the list is homosexuality. Not that societies haven't ever been this sinful before...but what we see happening now is GLOBAL. That's scarey. We will soon be living in a country in which we we will no long be allowed to voice TRUTH. While I can still speak it out, without getting into trouble, I will continue to say that homosexuality is sin. If no one says it, how will they ever know it? But it takes more than just saying it. It must be accompanied by love for the individuals. I can accept ANYONE for who they are. But when that person insists that I accept them for WHAT they are, in some instances, they are asking too much.
The Bible is clear on "receiving the love of the TRUTH". When a person, or society rejects TRUTH, it opens itself up to deception and finally, delusion. (II Thess. 2:10-12) I like to pray that God will give each of us a love of the TRUTH. Back to Romans 1...it would appear that there isn't much excuse for any of us, no matter what our chosen lifestyle might be. ( I could not agree with you more about levels of accountability. I grew up being taught the TRUTH that Jesus is the Son of God and loved me and gave His life for me. I am accountable for MUCH!!)
I do not blame the homosexuals alone for their enormous success in America today. I blame America for rejecting the TRUTH in our schools and universities...for refusing to tell the TRUTH about God...for passing laws that prohibit telling the TRUTH to our students....and thus causing the judgments of God on this fine nation.
I am very careful how I pray about homosexuality...lest I pray against the working of God. In His wisdom, He chose to "turn us over" and in His Mercy, may He choose to open each of our eyes to His precious TRUTH.
My concern is this; I am afraid that we will tolerate too much and send the message that "all is well", when, indeed, it is not. I would never want to judge these men who have chosen to use Chad for this incredible role. But I do want to honestly confess that I wish they would have used a man with similar convictions to those of Nate Saint. (Probably just my humanity speaking!! :-) )
Blessings,
Shari

7:18 AM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Shari,

Thanks again for a very sane, measured response. I was really worried about my own, because I had just come back from my second screening of End of the Spear prior to reading your post (and another, more hostile post attached to my interview with director Jim Hanon). It just burns me that, in connection with THIS film in particular, the discussion has to degenerate into arguments about homosexuality. And yes, I do think the producers would have been wise to disseminate information about Chad Allen's sexuality well in advance of the movie's opening to curtail as much of the fuss as possible. But I have to trust that they were trying to be faithful to what God wanted them to do, just as I would hope that give me as much credit in my own ministry. And I have a hard time arguing with Steve Saint's own line of reasoning.

I agree with almost everything you say, with just a couple of points for further discussion.

First, I'm not so sure about your reading of the situtation as God's judgment. You certainly may be right, though, and your reading of Romans 1 is fine. But in any event, Romans 1 and God's judgment are mere starting points. They're not the end of the story, thank God. Romans 6 and 8 present the solution to the dilemma of the flesh -- that is, the miraculous transforming work of the Holy Spirit -- and the Bible tells us repeatedly that God's mercy triumphs over his judgment. So judgment is necessary, as is naming sin for what it is. Yet both are still just stopping points along the journey, and we if overemphasize them without talking about where that journey leads (and keeping it well in sight) all we are left with is wailing and gnashing of teeth. I, for one, won't live there. (And I think you agree with me on that.) So if I err, I tend to err on the side of mercy, since it seems to me that the majority of the Christian subculture does a fine job of emphasizing judgment -- even merciless, pitiless judgment and condemnation. (I am not, of course, talking about you.)

Second, those people you and I want to love are watching this very conversation. They're here, in this virtual room, with us, right at our elbows. And they aren't convinced we are right, necessarily.

Is it really fair or right to talk about them in this way, pretending that they're not listening?

While I certainly agree with you that all is not well in our land, and that we must never pander to such an untruth, this particular conversation needs to be about this film in particular, and what it says -- not about the greater or more particular ills of our society. And the conversation needs to be conducted in way that invites those folks at our elbows to participate, in a loving manner.

End of the Spear has great things to say about universal truths -- that we are not slaves to human nature, that a Better Nature can and will bring us to become something we never thought possible or realistic. It is a loving tribute "to Him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we can ask or imagine."

And that's a great thing. And it's playing "in a theatre near you," not just in the Christian ghetto. And it's an excellent film, to boot!

Wow!!!! What a great thing!!!

Greg

10:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greg,
Sorry to have written things that took us off course, and certainly didn't mean to say anything as if others weren't watching. Nor did I mean to offend anyone.
I'm not really sure what you mean by "Christian subculture" or "Christian ghetto", but it would appear that you have a less than charitable opinion of the Christian world, at large. We HAVE been pretty judgmental; I'll have to agree with that, and I am not proud of it.
Our church bought out a theater for two showings, here in Dallas. One of our pastors told us Sunday that on Monday (yesterday) there was to be a special showing of "End of the Spear" at the United Nations with all 190 (?) national delegates invited. (Don't know where he got his info.) This movie has REALLY impressed people in "high places" with its message of peace and forgiveness---mercy that rules over judgment.
It is a story that magnifies the true message of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in such a way as to impact multitudes in a very POWERFUL way.
I guess the ultimate desire here is that God receive Glory from this picture---no matter what else happens, Huh??
Blessings,
Shari

2:54 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Shari,

Sorry about the catchprases "Christian subculture" and "Christian ghetto." In my own way, I guess I'm using offensive jargon, too, aren't I?

By and large, better than 90% of the American church's resources go to sustaining itself rather than into ministries outside the walls of the church. Most "Christian" entertainment reflects those kind of twisted priorities: movies and music made by Christians, about Christians,for Christians and "safe for the whole family." And most of it never sees the light of day outside the walls of the church.

End of the Spear breaks that mold somewhat. It isn't particularly concerned about being "safe" entertainment, was made with the involvement of non-believers, and has enough artistic integrity to stack well against playing in the multiplexes.

Do I "have a less than charitable opinion of the Christian world, at large?" I may often seem to. But I don't, really. Western culture in general would be in pretty sad shape without the influence of Christianity. I do think that, right now, the American church is incredibly narcissistic and obsessed with political power.

It's true that End of the Spear was screened at the United Nations. Every Tribe Entertainment issued a press release with the details.

The movie is, as you say, "a story that magnifies the true message of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in such a way as to impact multitudes in a very POWERFUL way." And yes, I think "the ultimate desire here is that God receive Glory from this picture -- no matter what else happens."

Good words!

Greg

8:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Greg,
I saw this movie last weekend and thought that it spoke a powerful message of forgiveness but also hope. Hope that Jesus is working in people's lives even when there seems to be no hope.

This movie raises many issues, but we must be careful in thinking that God always works the same way in every situation. As God said through Solomon..there is a time for war and a time for peace. If men like my Dad hadn't fought in WWII and help put a stop to Hitler and his Nazis, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. If men and women like my son weren't in Iraq, 24 million Iraqis would be under a cruel dictatorship with its rape and torture rooms. God wasn't an adolecent in the Old Testament and then grew up in the New Testament. All the Bible points to Jesus.

Gail

4:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just wanted to say something about this movie. its getting alot of bad reviews.I'm getting sick of reading time after time horrible things about this movie, it had a very unique idea it was refreshing from all the remake movies and sequals that have been coming out, the acting was good and the visuals were good. I'm thinking the reason its getting such a bad review is becasue if the spirituality of it. yet, everyone I know who's seen it says that they don't even realize its about that. they see a tribe change its ways after thousands of years. I wish critics would stop ripping on it, becasue the poor movie needs to get some credit. its times like this I wish I was a critic.

6:35 AM  
Blogger Sandra James said...

Jim Elliot has been my hero for several years. I saw this movie 3 times. The first time was opening weekend with my mom and a friend of mine. I cried all through the film and afterwords. It drives me nuts that so many people are saying bad things about it. thank you for standing up for a great movie.

1:24 PM  
Blogger Greg Wright said...

Sandra,

You're entirely welcome!

6:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find it interesting that in the majority of the posts which refer to specific people, it's always "Jim or Elizabeth Elliot" - they were not even the main characters in this movie. Sometimes it seems as though people see this as a one family mission - they could not have done it without the other families. Now that a movie is made from the perspective of another person, all the glory still goes to the Elliots. Should it be that way? what about giving due credit to the others who have given of their lives for this mission?

2:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home