Kingdom of Heaven
Why does a Crusader go to Jerusalem? If Ridley Scott’s somewhat fictionalized Balian of Ibelin supplies any answer, it’s this: a Crusader goes to Jerusalem not due to a clear conscience before God, but just the opposite. The protagonist of Kingdom of Heaven goes because he’s a miserable, disillusioned transgressor. He goes to Jerusalem hoping to find forgiveness and the hand of God. But what does he actually find?
Given the subject matter and the tenor of the times, we should all be a little wary of Crusader movies. Even with the best intentions, both on the part of the filmmaker and the audience, any depiction of the carnage that was the Crusades could easily fan the flames of today’s Middle-East conflicts. That being the case, we almost expected that Scott would fictionalize his tale somewhat; but the question remained: to what extent would fiction mix with “fact”? To Scott’s credit, and to my surprise, Kingdom manages a balanced and credible treatment of the historic tensions which led both to the Crusades themselves and to the end of the short-lived and precarious peace which Jerusalem did in fact enjoy under the reign of King Baldwin. And the very real historic person of Balian of Ibelin provides Scott with the perfect opportunity to generalize one man’s experience into Every Man’s familiar and troubling quest.
Kingdom of Heaven is not merely a period action picture; nor is it just a docudrama, nor a tract on Muslim-Christian relations. It’s all those things, but at its heart it transcends them, too; for what the film really portrays is the universal crisis of faith. Who among us, after all, has not at some point doubted either the existence of God or our right standing before Him? Whose conscience has never been troubled? Balian’s own crisis is both tragic and craven: in the midst of despair over his young wife’s death, he angrily and impulsively murders an insensitive and greedy priest. He flees to preserve his life and to join an expedition to the Holy Land, still believing, at least, the promise that the pilgrimage may lead to his redemption.
This fictional framing device leads to Ridley Scott’s period action-docudrama-tract: all of which is entertaining and illuminating. The battle sequences are neither gratuitous nor dull; they are skilfully handled and engaging. The illicit romance between Balian and the principal villain’s wife is simultaneously predictable and surprising. That noble and ignoble characters can be found in the camps of both Saladin and Baldwin is historically accurate, responsibly portrayed and instructive.
And this is all not merely window dressing, but crucial to—and wholly in the service of—Scott’s fictionalized hero. When all is said and done, Balian finds no profit in the knowledge that neither honor nor deceit are the exclusive property of Christianity; his faith is restored neither by high-cost chastity nor through legitimate love; the noble principles that guide King Baldwin, Balian’s father Godfrey or knights in general don’t save the world; even Balian’s own heroics merely delay inevitable carnage.
Balian finds neither faith nor forgiveness in Jerusalem because the city is no magic talisman. No city is. Fallen man is still fallen man, and no earthly city can fix that. Jerusalem, as the Muslim leader Saladin tells Balian, is nothing. Unless, of course, one has at least learned that very lesson from Jerusalem; then, perhaps, as Saladin also observes, Jerusalem may be everything.
At the end of Scott’s story, Balian is still a just a fugitive blacksmith in search of forgiveness and the hand of God: he has not completed his journey of faith; he has simply eliminated one useless and tragic option for its completion. Like Scott himself, Balian remains unsure of his faith.
Given the story and its setting, this is perhaps as it should be. Jerusalem itself, after all, is not the Way, the Truth and the Life—and Jesus never claimed that it was. He claimed that He was all that, and more. And as pop musicians Switchfoot observe in their song “Dare You To Move,” maybe a pilgrimage to Jerusalem is far too distant and unnecessary a journey:
Maybe redemption has stories to tell
Maybe forgiveness is right where you fell
Where can you run to escape from yourself?
Where you gonna go...
Salvation is here
Continue:
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—Spiritual Connections
8 Comments:
Awesome Awesome Movie! I liked the conflicts in the film most of all. There were the Christians who KNEW that they were doing what Christ wanted them to do (KNEW capitalized to emphasize their own arrogance and lack of attention to Scripture), the Muslims who KNEW they were doing the right thing, and Orlando Bloom's character, who, in his own uncertainty about God, ends up doing the right thing.
There are lines in this film that I'll add to my list of quotes. There's one key line early in the film that details the difference between religion and real relationship with God that's one of the most awesome lines I've ever heard in a movie. I almost wanted to cry during Balian's last speech where he defines what Jerusalem really and truly is. His words echo the very words of Christ. Powerful stuff...powerful movie!
Yeah -- this was a real pleasant surprise. When I first saw it, I thought (and told others) that it wasn't really my kind of movie, but it was very well done, responsible and balanced. Then when Ridley Scott mentioned that the ending wasn't supposed to resolved Balian's doubts, it made even more sense. Then, as time went by, I realized that this really was my kind of movie!
Wow. After having taked with Ridley Scott about his film, I can assure that he would respond to your comments with, "You really got it, Doug!"
I particularly liked your comment, "evil men do what evil men do, no matter when or where they are."
Thanks for the feedback!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hi! I'm a girl, 13 years of age, and you might be thinking "Oh well, she likes the movie because she is in love with Orlando Bloom. Yes. But it goes deeper. He's not the only reason. Being a devout christian, I like the fact that it brings veiws into play about christians and muslims that mnost people are scared to bring out in public. But it brings that view around in a very smooth way. For the Muslims, they end up making fools out of themselves and having to give a little to get what they want.For the Christians, they have ignorance about certain things that are right in front of their eyes, and they have to give a little to get what they want too. And a lot of doubt is involved because of their ignorance.Balian was fooled by a person that had ideas other than what the Bible said. The preist commited blashepmy, and threw Balian into doubt about his faith, even more so after Balian killed him. People say ignorance is bliss, and this movie turns that upside down.Balians ignorance, that God could not forgive him, caused a lot of pain and doubt, therefore causing him to seek worldly solutions to his doubt and pain, which in the end did nothing,and he had to rely on faith. What I like about the movie,is that nobody is perfect. Balian's father had a pst sin along with Balians mother, Balian was a fugitive, the Muslim leader was prideful and merciless until he was paid some mercy. The king was prideful and ignorant, thinking he was all knowing, therefore causing his own ruin just because Balian gave him advice. The queen commited fornication, and like I said, nobody was perfect. It did not sugarcoat it or uplift anybody.Instead it faced reality that this world is not the answer to things, no one is perfect, even in the war agianst other faiths, and it let it be known that faith alone can solve doubt and spiritual pain.
Now for the effect it has on different audiences is even more mazing. It compels christians to not be ignorant about their faith, and to know that God does forgive even the worst of sins if only you have the faith that if asked to forgive, God will. Also, for Muslims, it draws them in in the way that they are notm undermined by the christian view, and that christians are not perfect, and never said they were, but when in the right frame of mind under the Holy Spirit act like they should, and are different from they way they act and others act.
The medias reviews on it were based on the acting quality and the viewing quality, and not on the message. I read the newspapers reveiw, and immediately knew it was based on opinion, not fact. I think the reason the media did not pay it much attention is that it did not stirr up too much controversy; it was a great movie, did not offend but got its point across, and was not sugarcoating it to the audiences visionary appeal. It was reality, it did not TRY to bring in a large audience, because that was not the point of the movie. Movies that are made just for money often turn out to be flops because the don't go deep and inquire the contoversial side of things, and overall,they side with pop culture. And they do not engage the viewers mind, they just appeal in the physical aspect.Movies that are made for reasons beyond money are the compelete opposite: They go deep, engage the minds of the audience, and go beyond the physical appeal of things, and actually ask questions that everybody is afraid to ask. I believe people are more drawn to these types of movies because we are not just physical, but spiritual and intellectual to. The physical side brings more money because is so appealing to the eye. But the spiritual side to movies brings about a sort of, relief. It can answer questions, make people FEEL things. The media did not want to bring attention to this side of the movie because the media has only gave its appeal to the physical aspect, inferring it will bring about more money. They did not want it to be a sucess because people would start to want more and more "deeper" films made,because they are better, therefore ruining Hollywoods "good looks, and glitz and glam" appeal, which woulod make them look bad. Now i'm not saying Hollywood won't promote it, because they will because it did bring in a large amount of money, but that is the reason the newspaper reviews were not as good. Money and opinion. Kingdom of Heaven was a great movie that deserves an Oscar, along with Orlando Bloom who proves that he can be both eye candy and a great actor at the same time.
Again I say, Wow! You've got an excellent ability to read film. Your comments on this movie are right on the spot.
I do know for a fact that the studio went all out in promoting this film. The junket I attended was the most elaborate I've ever been to. They even brought in scholars to educate the press about the history of the crusades.
And maybe that's where they went wrong. Maybe the press felt they were being lectured or educated instead of entertained. And that's a BAD thing?
But you're right -- the reviews weren't as good as they should have been. And you're also right, I think, in guessing that it's because the movie wasn't controversial enough for them. Ridley Scott's direction was far too responsible, I guess!
I'm glad you liked the film (and Orlando's performance), and thanks for taking the time to write an excellent post!
Bill in Oklahoma, Ordained minister: I watched The Kingdom of Heaven this afternoon and was overwelhemed by the pagentry, sepctacle and the profound faith that was captured in the essence of the film. The review by the 13 year old was awesome and said it all that I would like to have said. Hats off to her--one day she might make a great movie reviewer. I was very impressed on the DVD of the Pilgrims guide which kept me captivated with the historical references of the different cultures and accuracies of real history--its not easy distinguishing fact from history and the pilgrims guide made that transition very easy for me. I definitely will purchase the DVD and see it many more times.
Thanks for letting me share
Thanks for the feedback, Bill. I'm looking forward to seeing the "director's cut" of this one!
Post a Comment
<< Home